Neueste Artikel von commondreams.org

Die nach­fol­gen­den Arti­kel sind von commondreams.org und wer­den mit Hil­fe eines Feed­rea­ders gela­den. Durch Kli­cken der Arti­kel­über­schrif­ten gelangst Du direkt zum Arti­kel auf der Web­site von commondreams.org.

Common Dreams Common Dreams

  • ‘Fox Is Guar­ding the Hen House’: ICE Agents Told FBI Will No Lon­ger Inves­ti­ga­te Con­fron­ta­ti­ons
    von Julia Con­ley am Sonn­tag, 19. Juli 2026 um 23:04

    New gui­dance dis­tri­bu­ted to US Immi­gra­ti­on and Cus­toms Enforce­ment agents across the coun­try in recent days said that the FBI will no lon­ger inves­ti­ga­te con­fron­ta­ti­ons that offi­cers have with pro­tes­ters or peo­p­le who are sub­jec­ted to immi­gra­ti­on enforcement—leaving the agen­cy to inves­ti­ga­te its own vio­lent encoun­ters with the public fol­lo­wing at least two recent kil­lings by ICE agents. The gui­dance per­tai­ned to claims of assault against Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­ri­ty (DHS) offi­cers, but FBI inves­ti­ga­ti­ons have gathe­red evi­dence that impli­ca­ted agents them­sel­ves after they clai­med to have been atta­cked. Accor­ding to the mes­sa­ge sent to ICE offi­cers, Home­land Secu­ri­ty Inves­ti­ga­ti­ons, which ope­ra­tes under ICE, would begin exami­ning inci­dents in which an agent clai­med they were assaul­ted. HSI does not have juris­dic­tion to inves­ti­ga­te alle­ga­ti­ons of civil rights alle­ga­ti­ons, so in cases in which a con­fron­ta­ti­on escala­tes to a use of force by an offi­cer, the unit would be unli­kely to inves­ti­ga­te whe­ther the agent vio­la­ted the victim’s rights, The New York Times reported.“The fox is guar­ding the hen house,” said Ame­ri­can Immi­gra­ti­on Coun­cil seni­or fel­low Aaron Reich­lin-Mel­nick of the repor­ted change.Despite the gui­dance that was cir­cu­la­ted to agents, the US Depart­ment of Jus­ti­ce, which over­sees the FBI, released a joint state­ment with DHS deny­ing that the chan­ge would take place.“The rela­ti­onship bet­ween DHS and DOJ in inves­ti­ga­ting assault on fede­ral offi­cer cases has not chan­ged, and FBI will con­ti­nue to inves­ti­ga­te in accordance with agen­cy poli­cy,” the state­ment said. “This admi­nis­tra­ti­on has been clear, anyo­ne who assaults law enforce­ment will be pro­se­cu­ted to the ful­lest ext­ent of the law.”According to a New York Times inves­ti­ga­ti­on, the Trump admi­nis­tra­ti­on filed char­ges against more than 550 peo­p­le who it said assaul­ted fede­ral immi­gra­ti­on offi­cers. More than 400 of the cases had been resol­ved, and in near­ly half of them, char­ges of assault had been thrown out or with­drawn, or the defen­dants had been acquit­ted. As it’s filed such char­ges, the Trump admi­nis­tra­ti­on has fre­quent­ly repea­ted its asser­ti­on that fede­ral agents are regu­lar­ly facing vio­lent attacks from the public—including in cases in which agents have kil­led US citi­zens and immi­grants, inclu­ding Renee Good, Alex Pret­ti, and ear­lier this month, Loren­zo Sal­ga­do Araujo.The repor­ted chan­ge was also made public less than a week after an ICE agent fatal­ly shot Johan Sebas­tián Guer­re­ro in Bidde­ford, Maine.Journalist Sam Stein said the gui­dance that was given to fede­ral agents could grant “pure impu­ni­ty for ICE to do hor­ri­ble things.”

  • Ral­ly­ing in Michi­gan, San­ders Says Pri­ma­ry Race Is Bet­ween Abdul El-Say­ed ‘and the Bil­lionaire Clas­s’
    von Julia Con­ley am Sonn­tag, 19. Juli 2026 um 18:06

    Ahead of ear­ly voting in Michigan’s Demo­cra­tic US Sena­te pri­ma­ry, can­di­da­te and Medi­ca­re for All advo­ca­te Abdul El-Say­ed was joi­n­ed in Detroit Satur­day evening by pro­gres­si­ve lea­ders, inclu­ding Sen. Ber­nie San­ders and Reps. Alex­an­dria Oca­sio-Cor­tez and Ras­hi­da Tlaib, for a ral­ly titled: “The Peo­p­le vs. The Powerful.“The sena­tor declared to 1,600 atten­de­es that the choice in the pri­ma­ry is not sim­ply bet­ween El-Say­ed and his oppo­nent, Rep. Haley Ste­vens. “In all due respect to Con­gress­wo­man Ste­vens, ever­yo­ne knows that this is not an elec­tion bet­ween her and Abdul El-Say­ed,” said the Ver­mont Inde­pen­dent sena­tor. “This is an elec­tion bet­ween Abdul and the bil­lionaire class.“Sanders: In all due respect to Con­gress­wo­man Ste­vens, ever­yo­ne knows that this is not an elec­tion bet­ween her and Abdul El-Say­ed. This is an elec­tion bet­ween Abdul and the bil­lionaire class. That is what this elec­tion is about.A bil­lionaire class which has already—and the­re are… pic.twitter.com/BPZ9NSar4d— Acyn (@Acyn) July 18, 2026 The final weeks of the pri­ma­ry, in which Michi­gan voters will go to the polls on August 4, have been mark­ed by reports of mas­si­ve out­side spen­ding in favor of Ste­vens and against El-Say­ed, who has made the refrain, “Money out of poli­tics, money in your pocket, and Medi­ca­re for All” the cen­tral mes­sa­ge of his cam­paign. As Com­mon Dreams repor­ted last week, El-Say­ed led the way in fund­rai­sing in the second quar­ter of 2026, brin­ging in $4.6 mil­li­on while Ste­vens rai­sed $2.2 mil­li­on. But Fede­ral Elec­tion Com­mis­si­on (FEC) cam­paign finan­ce filings show­ed that out­side spen­ding by peo­p­le and groups sup­port­ing Ste­vens has soared to an esti­ma­ted $50 mil­li­on, accor­ding to an ana­ly­sis by Punch­bowl News. “More than half of the total ($28.4 mil­li­on) is coming from United Demo­cra­cy Pro­ject (UDP),” said con­gres­sio­nal repor­ter Ally Mut­nick, refer­ring to the super poli­ti­cal action com­mit­tee (PAC) affi­lia­ted with the Ame­ri­can Isra­el Public Affairs Com­mit­tee (AIPAC), which has also backed the vehe­men­t­ly pro-Isra­el Ste­vens in the past. UDP ack­now­led­ged last week that it had spent near­ly $15 mil­li­on on the Michi­gan Sena­te pri­ma­ry race so far, inclu­ding $9.3 mil­li­on in sup­port of Ste­vens and $5.7 mil­li­on against El-Sayed.El-Sayed is a strong sup­port­er of Pal­es­ti­ni­an rights and—like a gro­wing majo­ri­ty of Demo­cra­tic voters after more than two years of Israel’s assault on Gaza—has cal­led for the US to end mili­ta­ry aid to Isra­el. In recent weeks he has respon­ded to repor­ters’ fre­quent ques­ti­ons on his views about whe­ther Isra­el has a “right to exist,” by asking whe­ther Pal­es­ti­ne has a right to exist and, in a Sun­day inter­view with CNN’s Jake Tap­per, say­ing that a more per­ti­nent ques­ti­on for Ame­ri­can voters is whe­ther Isra­el has “a right to our tax dollars.“Does Michi­gan Sena­te can­di­da­te Abdul El-Say­ed think there’s room in the Demo­cra­tic Par­ty for both sup­port­ers and oppon­ents of Israel?EL-SAYED: “There’s always room in the tent for folks. And I’m for human rights. I’m for equal rights to peace, digni­ty, and self-deter­mi­na­ti­on.… pic.twitter.com/Amfvsnmx6J— Sta­te of the Uni­on (@CNNSOTU) July 19, 2026 At the ral­ly on Satur­day night, San­ders said that AIPAC’s focus on fun­ding Ste­vens’ cam­paign “has ever­y­thing to do with the fact that they under­stand that Abdul and I, and the vast majo­ri­ty of the Ame­ri­can peo­p­le, want a for­eign poli­cy that is based on mora­li­ty and decency.”“This is an elec­tion that will show the nati­on whe­ther AIPAC and other bil­lionaire-fun­ded super PACs can spend tens and tens and tens of mil­li­ons of dol­lars to buy a US Sena­te seat, or whe­ther, within a cor­rupt cam­paign finan­ce sys­tem, the voices of ordi­na­ry Americans—the peo­p­le of Michigan—can pre­vail,” said San­ders. “That is what this cam­paign is all about. It is about demo­cra­cy ver­sus olig­ar­chy, and we are on the side of democracy.“Sanders: Why is the who­le coun­try loo­king at this elec­tion? In fact, peo­p­le all over the world are wat­ching what’s going on here in Michigan.And the ans­wer is that this is an elec­tion that will show the nati­on whe­ther AIPAC and other bil­lionaire-fun­ded super PACs can spend tens… pic.twitter.com/ALMk10YzJu— Acyn (@Acyn) July 18, 2026 Oca­sio-Cor­tez noted that the con­test bet­ween El-Say­ed and Ste­vens comes as Ame­ri­cans are strugg­ling to afford gro­ce­ries, gas, and other essen­ti­als while Pre­si­dent Donald Trump con­ti­nues his war against Iran, dis­mis­ses working fami­lies’ finan­cial strug­gles, and insists the fede­ral govern­ment can­not afford to pro­vi­de uni­ver­sal public ser­vices. “When the sta­kes are so high, when more peo­p­le than ever are living so clo­se to the bone, even­tual­ly we have to ask our­sel­ves: Is the ans­wer to our pro­blems to turn to the same play­book over and over again?” said Oca­sio-Cor­tez. “A play­book that says, in order to win, Demo­crats must rely on the same dark money—$50 mil­li­on and counting—from the same peo­p­le who backed 35 elec­tion deni­ers to Con­gress who voted to over­turn the 2020 election?”“I belie­ve Michiganders—Democrats, Repu­bli­cans, and independents—believe that good lea­der­ship swings for the fen­ces,” said the con­gress­wo­man, who has been named as a poten­ti­al pre­si­den­ti­al or US Sena­te can­di­da­te in 2028. “Good lea­der­ship gets big money out of our sys­tem. It takes on the cor­rup­ti­on that blocks com­mon­sen­se solu­ti­ons that lift working peo­p­le. And, by the way, it helps not to take their money in the first place.“AOC: When the sta­kes are so high, when more peo­p­le than ever are living so clo­se to the bone, even­tual­ly we have to ask ourselves:Is the ans­wer to our pro­blems to turn to the same play­book over and over again? A play­book that says, in order to win, Demo­crats must rely on the… pic.twitter.com/oqIaQzSQfH— Acyn (@Acyn) July 18, 2026 “We can choo­se to reward the $50 mil­li­on in dark money by voting their way—which, by the way Michigan—do you think that $50 mil­li­on is for free?” con­tin­ued Oca­sio-Cor­tez. “Do you think it’s an act of cha­ri­ty? We know how this works. There’s $50 mil­li­on in this race becau­se they’re expec­ting a return. It’s an invest­ment… So we can choo­se that or we can choo­se Dr. Abdul El-Say­ed for the United Sta­tes Sena­te.” On Sun­day, as El-Say­ed and his high-pro­fi­le sup­port­ers in Con­gress pre­pared to ral­ly more voters in Grand Rapids and Lan­sing, CNN repor­ted that House Mino­ri­ty Lea­der Hakeem Jef­fries (D‑NY) and Rep. Gre­go­ry Meeks (D‑NY) had con­fron­ted San­ders in a pho­ne call, com­plai­ning about his “meddling” in pri­ma­ry elections.“The can­di­da­tes we are sup­port­ing are can­di­da­tes who are repre­sen­ting working peo­p­le, and I think it’s a long time over­due for the Demo­cra­tic Par­ty to stop worry­ing about their wealt­hy cam­paign fun­ders and start worry­ing about the needs of working peo­p­le,” San­ders told CNN. CNN cor­re­spon­dent Seung Min Kim sug­gested that Ste­vens is seen by Demo­cra­tic lea­ders as a safer bet to win the gene­ral elec­tion in Michi­gan in a cru­cial elec­tion year. But recent polls have shown her views on Isra­el and her sup­port from AIPAC, as well as her dona­ti­ons from the for-pro­fit health insu­rance indus­try and her oppo­si­ti­on to Medi­ca­re for All, could harm, not help, Ste­vens. Along with big spen­ding from the pro-Isra­el lob­by, the pri­ma­ry race has been cha­rac­te­ri­zed in recent weeks by El-Sayed’s call for social media users to refrain from mocking and making per­so­nal attacks against Ste­vens and to focus ins­tead on the issues at the cen­ter of the cam­paign, as well as recent Isla­mo­pho­bic vitri­ol against El-Say­ed, inclu­ding from Sen. John Fet­ter­man (D‑Penn.).Fetterman told Fox News Satur­day that El-Say­ed is “essen­ti­al­ly, a pro-Hamas can­di­da­te that’s been anti-Ame­ri­can and deep­ly anti-Isra­el,” adding that “44% of Mus­lims, you know, they have posi­ti­ve views of Hamas.“Journalist Prem Thak­ker of Zeteo News cal­led on Ste­vens to “con­demn this racist and Isla­mo­pho­bic rhe­to­ric coming from your allies,” as El-Say­ed had ear­lier cal­led for civi­li­ty from his own sup­port­ers. El-Say­ed poin­ted to the recent attacks at the ral­ly, say­ing his oppon­ents “have taken to cal­ling me ‘dan­ge­rous.’ ”“If you’­re a worker who wants our eco­no­my to work for you, I’m not dan­ge­rous,” said El-Say­ed. “If you’­re someone sit­ting in medi­cal debt, won­de­ring what your finan­cial future is becau­se you deig­ned to see a doc­tor in the richest, most powerful coun­try in the world, if you’­re that per­son, I’m not dangerous.“El-Sayed: They’ve taken to cal­ling me dangerous.If you’re a worker who wants our eco­no­my to work for you, I’m not dangerous.If you’re AIPAC and want to send our money abroad, you damn well bet­ter belie­ve I’m dangerous.If you’re Chuck Schu­mer and want to keep doling out… pic.twitter.com/S7HhzThsST— Acyn (@Acyn) July 18, 2026 “But if you’­re Blue Cross Blue Shield share­hol­ders, yep, I’m dan­ge­rous!” he added. “If you’re AIPAC and want to send our money abroad, you damn well bet­ter belie­ve I’m dan­ge­rous. If you’re Chuck Schu­mer and want to keep doling out cor­po­ra­te money to elect peo­p­le who are going to do your bid­ding, I am so damn dangerous!”“If you’­re some­bo­dy who wants govern­ment to work for you,” El-Say­ed said, “I aim to be the best fri­end you ever had.”

  • ‘Working-Class Orga­ni­zing Wins’: Troy Jack­son Pulls Ahead in Race to Replace Plat­ner in Maine
    von Julia Con­ley am Sonn­tag, 19. Juli 2026 um 14:48

    As Demo­cra­tic US Sena­te can­di­da­te Troy Jack­son pul­led far ahead of his oppon­ents in the race to replace Gra­ham Plat­ner as the party’s nomi­nee on Satur­day, one com­men­ta­tor cre­di­ted the for­mer sta­te Sena­te president’s cam­paign with an “extre­me­ly impres­si­ve orga­niza­tio­nal feat”—one that was focu­sed on nomi­na­ting a working-class cham­pi­on. Eight of Maine’s 16 coun­ties held in-per­son and vir­tu­al dele­ga­te nomi­na­ting mee­tings on Satur­day, deci­ding on the first 319 of 500 total dele­ga­tes who will vote for the Demo­cra­tic nomi­nee at next weekend’s con­ven­ti­on, which was rapidly orga­ni­zed after Plat­ner drop­ped out of the race last week fol­lo­wing rape alle­ga­ti­ons that he denied. At least 290 of the dele­ga­tes who were cho­sen in the first eight coun­ties backed Jack­son, the Ban­gor Dai­ly News repor­ted. The for­mer log­ger, who pre­vious­ly ran for gover­nor, has deep uni­on ties, and has been endor­sed by Sen. Ber­nie San­ders (I‑Vt.), won at least 148 of the 149 dele­ga­tes in Cum­ber­land Coun­ty, all 44 dele­ga­tes in Pen­ob­s­cot, and 22 of 23 in Han­cock, domi­na­ting in seve­ral other coun­ties as well. The rest of the state’s coun­ties will vote on dele­ga­tes at simi­lar mee­tings on Sun­day, but as one elec­tion wat­cher said, “Troy Jack­son will almost cer­tain­ly be the next Demo­cra­tic nomi­nee for Maine’s 2026 US Sena­te elec­tion.” Jack­son appeared con­fi­dent enough in Saturday’s results to announ­ce a cele­bra­to­ry tail­ga­te plan­ned for Sun­day in York Coun­ty as voters the­re would be sel­ec­ting dele­ga­tes. The Maine Sta­te Nur­ses Asso­cia­ti­on also announ­ced its endor­se­ment of the can­di­da­te on Sun­day mor­ning. After Saturday’s coun­ty mee­tings, Jack­son addres­sed some of his sup­port­ers vir­tual­ly, giving his vol­un­teer net­work cre­dit for quick­ly orga­ni­zing on his behalf after many had pre­vious­ly expec­ted to be cam­paig­ning for Plat­ner, who spent near­ly a year mobi­li­zing Main­ers from across the poli­ti­cal spec­trum with a plat­form focu­sed on taxing bil­lionaires, ending US “fore­ver wars” and mili­ta­ry aid for Isra­el, and pas­sing Medi­ca­re for All. “I can’t tell you how much I app­re­cia­te all the hard, hard work. I’ve been get­ting text mes­sa­ges all day about what a gre­at job I did. I did­n’t do a god­damn thing, all of you just smo­ked it,” said Jack­son in a video pos­ted on social media. “It’s real­ly, real­ly incre­di­ble, so thank you so much. We’­re well on our way to get­ting the govern­ment that we fuck­ing deser­ve, and that’s what I’m exci­ted about.” Orga­ni­zed vol­un­teers atten­ded some of the coun­ty con­ven­ti­ons, some wea­ring “Jack­son for Maine” t‑shirts lef­to­ver from the candidate’s guber­na­to­ri­al run and pas­sing out fly­ers with the names of the pro-Jack­son dele­ga­te slate—supporters whom vol­un­teers had spent the past week cal­ling to secu­re their com­mit­ment to the pro­gres­si­ve can­di­da­te. The eight remai­ning coun­ties will sel­ect 181 more dele­ga­tes on Sun­day. Ano­ther 101 Demo­cra­tic sta­te com­mit­tee mem­bers have alre­a­dy been cho­sen to attend the sta­te­wi­de con­ven­ti­on on July 25. Tog­e­ther they make up the 601 dele­ga­tes who will vote for the party’s nomi­nee. The party’s nomi­nee will face five-term Repu­bli­can Sen. Sus­an Coll­ins, whom Jack­son has con­dem­ned in recent days for voting to fund US Immi­gra­ti­on and Cus­toms Enforce­ment, which he has cal­led to abo­lish. An ICE agent fatal­ly shot 25-year-old Johan Sebas­tián Guer­re­ro in Bidde­ford, Maine last week.A poll by Wed­ge­wood ear­lier this month found Jack­son lea­ding Coll­ins in a hypo­the­ti­cal matchup, 48–43, with 9% of voters undecided.Ahead of Saturday’s mee­tings, Jack­son addres­sed a crowd of about 100 sup­port­ers in Port­land. “I’m run­ning for the log­ger in Alla­g­ash who does not think that anyo­ne in Washing­ton knows about them,” said Jack­son. “I’m run­ning for the nur­se that’s working ano­ther dou­ble shift becau­se their hos­pi­tal is under­staf­fed, and all the while bil­lionaires and mas­si­ve cor­po­ra­ti­ons are making record pro­fits, buy­ing influence in Washing­ton, and tel­ling the rest of us that the­re is just not­hing that we can do.”“I’m asking for your vote, but I’m also asking for more than that,” he added. “I’m asking you to orga­ni­ze… I’m asking you to talk to your neigh­bors. I’m asking you to show up at your coun­ty mee­tings, make the calls, send the texts, and bring even more peo­p­le into this movement.”Writer Cole San­dick sug­gested that despi­te the exci­te­ment that Platner’s cam­paign had gene­ra­ted, many of his sup­port­ers appeared to have quick­ly pivo­ted toward Jack­son, also a Medi­ca­re for All sup­port­er and oppo­nent of mili­ta­ry aid for Isra­el, in an effort to ensu­re pro­gres­si­ve prio­ri­ties are repre­sen­ted in the Sena­te. “Working-class orga­ni­zing wins,” said one Maine-based wri­ter.

  • Mamda­ni Says He Is Exami­ning Whe­ther His Govern­ment Can Arrest Net­an­ya­hu During NYC Visit
    von Julia Con­ley am Sonn­tag, 19. Juli 2026 um 1:12

    In a wide-ran­ging inter­view with The New York Times Satur­day, New York City Mayor Zohr­an Mamda­ni made clear that he plans to take any action available to him to ensu­re the city com­pli­es with the Inter­na­tio­nal Cri­mi­nal Court’s war­rant for the arrest of Israe­li Prime Minis­ter Ben­ja­min Net­an­ya­hu if the oppor­tu­ni­ty ari­ses. Net­an­ya­hu, said Mamda­ni, “belongs in The Hague,” and he is curr­ent­ly exami­ning whe­ther his govern­ment has the aut­ho­ri­ty to arrest the prime minis­ter if he visits the city for the United Nati­ons Gene­ral Assem­bly in Sep­tem­ber. “He’s a war cri­mi­nal who has been char­ged by the Inter­na­tio­nal Cri­mi­nal Court,” said the mayor. “I will fol­low the laws that we have here in New York City becau­se I belie­ve that the­re is an importance in fol­lo­wing the law as a lea­der who pre­si­des over our city.“He then cla­ri­fied that “wha­te­ver the law allows me to do in New York City, that’s what we will do, but we won’t be wri­ting our own laws to that end.“WATCH: NYC Mayor Zohr­an Mamda­ni said he is in “an acti­ve con­ver­sa­ti­on” with the city’s Law Depart­ment about whe­ther he has the aut­ho­ri­ty to order the arrest of Israe­li Prime Minis­ter Ben­ja­min Net­an­ya­hu if he visits New York for the U.N. Gene­ral Assembly.“I belie­ve that Prime… pic.twitter.com/GZJAfbvWGU— Clash Report (@clashreport) July 18, 2026 The mayor told Lulu Gar­cia-Navar­ro, host of the newspaper’s “The Inter­view,” that he is having “an acti­ve con­ver­sa­ti­on with our legal depart­ment” to deter­mi­ne the scope of Mamdani’s aut­ho­ri­ty on the mat­ter. In Novem­ber 2024, the ICC issued a war­rant for Net­an­ya­hu, for­mer Israe­li Defen­se Minis­ter Yoav Gal­lant, and Hamas lea­der Moham­med Diab Ibra­him Al-Mas­ri, who was kil­led by Israe­li forces. Net­an­ya­hu was accu­sed of cri­mes against huma­ni­ty and war cri­mes in Gaza, whe­re Isra­el began a relent­less assault in 2023 in reta­lia­ti­on for a Hamas-led attack. Isra­el and its top mili­ta­ry fun­der, the US govern­ment, have insis­ted that the Isra­el Defen­se Forces (IDF) have been tar­ge­ting Hamas in attacks that are still con­ti­nuing in Gaza despi­te a ceas­e­fi­re that was rea­ched last Octo­ber. But evi­dence has ste­adi­ly moun­ted that child­ren, aid workers, refu­gee camps, schools, and hos­pi­tals have been atta­cked, and experts found last year that Isra­el was inten­tio­nal­ly star­ving Pal­es­ti­ni­ans in Gaza as a method of war­fa­re. More than 73,000 Pal­es­ti­ni­ans have been kil­led in Gaza, and more than 173,000 peo­p­le have been woun­ded. Israe­li attacks have made Gaza home to the lar­gest num­ber of child ampu­tees in the world, and have deci­ma­ted over 90% of housing units in the excla­ve. Gar­cia-Navar­ro ques­tio­ned Mamda­ni on the “poli­ti­cal weight” he gives to the issue of Isra­el and Pal­es­ti­ne, which has seen a mark­ed shift in US public opi­ni­on sin­ce Isra­el began its latest US-backed assault on Gaza. More than half of Demo­cra­tic voters and near­ly a third of all voters told The Asso­cia­ted Press last month that they view­ed the war in Gaza as a geno­ci­de against Pal­es­ti­ni­ans. Three-quar­ters of respond­ents to a New York Times poll in May said they oppo­sed con­ti­nuing to send mili­ta­ry aid to Isra­el, com­pared to 45% three years ago. “It’s hard to explain to a New Yor­ker why their needs are not even being dis­cus­sed, and yet we have bil­li­ons of dol­lars to kill civi­li­ans half­way across the world,” said Mamda­ni, who has been laser-focu­sed during his term and his cam­paign last year on lowe­ring the cost of living for New Yor­kers and pas­sing uni­ver­sal public programs.“I think what we have seen from New Yor­kers, what we’ve seen from Ame­ri­cans, when we talk about this hun­ger for a new kind of poli­tics, it’s a hun­ger to move bey­ond the bank­rupt­cy that cha­rac­te­ri­zes a lot of poli­tics today,” said Mamda­ni. “And it is hard to find a more bank­rupt poli­cy approach than what our coun­try has done to Gaza and to Pal­es­ti­ne and how it hasn’t been spe­ci­fic to any one par­ty. It’s been, again and again, an insis­tence to tell New Yor­kers, and to tell Ame­ri­cans, that what they are see­ing is not some­thing they should in fact eit­her be con­cer­ned by or belie­ve in. It is hard to then turn to ano­ther issue and say, Belie­ve me here.” View this post on Insta­gram A post shared by The Inter­view (@theinterview_nyt)Israel’s ambassa­dor to the United Nati­ons said Satur­day that Net­an­ya­hu will be at the UN mee­ting in New York City in Sep­tem­ber, despi­te Mamdani’s threats—which date back to his mayoral campaign—while the prime minis­ter said on a radio show this week that the mayor “hates Ame­ri­ca” and cham­pi­ons Hamas. Jour­na­list Meh­di Hasan said it was “pret­ty ama­zing to hear” Mamda­ni repeat his ear­lier con­vic­tion that Net­an­ya­hu should be arres­ted under the ICC war­rant, given that he first publicly remark­ed on the issue “when he was pol­ling at 1% in the Demo­cra­tic pri­ma­ry polls and no one expec­ted him to actual­ly be mayor.“Netanyahu has thus far eva­ded arrest when tra­ve­ling to count­ries that reco­gni­ze the ICC’s aut­ho­ri­ty under the Rome Sta­tu­te. The court ope­ned an inquiry into Hun­ga­ry last year when it fai­led to detain the prime minis­ter when he visi­ted. France also said it would not exe­cu­te the war­rant for Net­an­ya­hu becau­se Isra­el is not a par­ty to the Rome Sta­tu­te. UN Ambassa­dor Micha­el Waltz respon­ded to Mamdani’s inter­view on Satur­day, say­ing the US is also not par­ty to the Rome Sta­tu­te. Jour­na­list Zaid Jila­ni said that alt­hough the mayor of New York likely lacks the aut­ho­ri­ty to arrest Net­an­ya­hu, “he can cer­tain­ly troll him.”

  • ‘War Crime’: US Attack on Water Desa­li­na­ti­on Plant Cuts Off Sup­p­ly for Thou­sands in Sou­thern Iran
    von Julia Con­ley am Sams­tag, 18. Juli 2026 um 18:08

    About 10,000 peo­p­le in near­ly two dozen vil­la­ges in sou­thern Iran were wit­hout drin­king water while the regi­on was under an exces­si­ve heat war­ning on Satur­day, after the US struck a water desa­li­na­ti­on plant in the vil­la­ge of Bon­ji in one of its latest attacks on Ira­ni­an civi­li­an infra­struc­tu­re. Isla­mic Repu­blic of Iran Broad­cas­ting said the drin­king water sup­p­ly was expec­ted to be res­to­red within a week, and emer­gen­cy sup­p­ly ope­ra­ti­ons had begun. Drop Site News repor­ted comm­ents from the depu­ty gover­nor for poli­ti­cal and secu­ri­ty affairs in Hor­moz­gan pro­vin­ce, who said seve­ral mis­siles had hit power infra­struc­tu­re and water desa­li­na­ti­on plants in the regi­on near the Strait of Hor­muz, which Pre­si­dent Donald Trump has deman­ded con­trol over as he’s ram­ped up attacks on Iran in recent days, despi­te a ceas­e­fi­re and a memo­ran­dum of under­stan­ding (MOU) to end hosti­li­ties that was agreed to in June. On Satur­day, Ira­ni­an offi­ci­als said the coun­try was sus­pen­ding its com­mit­ments to the MOU after the US vio­la­ted the agree­ment repea­ted­ly over the past week. “The US has vio­la­ted and sus­pen­ded all its com­mit­ments within the frame­work of the Islam­abad MOU,” said Depu­ty For­eign Minis­ter Kazem Gha­ri­bab­a­di. “We also like­wi­se have sus­pen­ded all of our com­mit­ments as a result; we are no lon­ger imple­men­ting tho­se commitments.“He added that Tehr­an is now “busy defen­ding the country.“A repre­sen­ta­ti­ve for Hor­moz­gan pro­vin­ce, Ahmad Mora­di, told Iran’s Tas­nim news agen­cy that over the past two nights, “about seven to eight peo­p­le” have been kil­led in US attacks, all of whom were civi­li­ans. One attack tar­ge­ted a bridge and hit two fami­ly cars. The neigh­bor­hood of Tap­peh Allaho Akbar in Bandar Abbas was also hit, kil­ling a woman and inju­ring a one-year-old, who­se wounds requi­red doc­tors to ampu­ta­te. At least 116 tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on towers were out of ser­vice in sou­thern Iran Satur­day, Al Jaze­era repor­ted. The Ira­ni­an Embas­sy in India pos­ted a video of the des­truc­tion of a bridge and also con­dem­ned the US attack on a mari­ti­me sur­veil­lan­ce tower at the Cha­ba­har Port, which US Secre­ta­ry of Defen­se Pete Hegs­eth boas­ted about on social media on Thurs­day. “For a sta­te that once cast its­elf as the glo­bal cham­pi­on of order, libe­ra­lism, and the war on ter­ro­rism, proud­ly dis­play­ing images of des­troy­ed bridges and civi­li­an infra­struc­tu­re has beco­me its only remai­ning ‘vic­to­ry,’ ” said Esmaeil Baqaei, a spo­kesper­son for Iran’s Minis­try of For­eign Affairs, on Satur­day. “Yet with the col­lap­se of every bridge, every tower, and every civi­li­an faci­li­ty, it is not mere­ly steel and con­cre­te that is being redu­ced to rub­ble. It is America’s moral standing—along with the enti­re archi­tec­tu­re of inter­na­tio­nal law and the civi­liza­tio­nal claims of the West—that is crumbling befo­re the world’s eyes.“According to Drop Site, US attacks have tar­ge­ted nine bridges, two air­ports, a rail­road junc­tion, and a road tun­nel sin­ce Wed­nes­day. At least 41 Ira­ni­ans have been kil­led and 408 have been woun­ded in US attacks so far this month, with Ira­ni­an aut­ho­ri­ties report­ing that at least three women and one child are among tho­se kil­led. In a let­ter to United Nati­ons Secre­ta­ry Gene­ral Antó­nio Guter­res, Amir-Saeid Ira­va­ni, Iran’s per­ma­nent UN repre­sen­ta­ti­ve, wro­te on Satur­day that US attacks had “tar­ge­ted and cau­sed exten­si­ve dama­ge to ports, trans­por­ta­ti­on net­works, com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons faci­li­ties, logi­stics hubs, radar instal­la­ti­ons, coas­tal defen­se sys­tems and other infra­struc­tu­re indis­pensable to the civi­li­an popu­la­ti­on, and to the func­tio­ning of the natio­nal economy.”“The con­tin­ued com­mis­si­on of the­se unlawful armed attacks poses a gra­ve thre­at to inter­na­tio­nal peace and secu­ri­ty, free­dom of navi­ga­ti­on, regio­nal sta­bi­li­ty, and the secu­ri­ty of the Per­si­an Gulf and the Strait of Hor­muz,” wro­te Ira­va­ni. Iran has reta­lia­ted against the US this week by striking Ame­ri­can allies, inclu­ding Kuwait, Bah­rain, and Jor­dan. Kuwait’s govern­ment Satur­day said a power plant and water tre­at­ment plant had been atta­cked for the second time in two days, as well as an oil facility.Two US sol­diers were kil­led and a third was miss­ing after an Ira­ni­an attack on a US mili­ta­ry base in Jordan—the first Ame­ri­can ser­vice mem­bers to be kil­led from hosti­le fire sin­ce an initi­al ceas­e­fi­re was bro­ke­red in April. Roxa­ne Farm­anf­ar­mi­an, a pro­fes­sor of Midd­le East poli­tics at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cam­bridge, told Al Jaze­era that Ira­ni­an forces are “using Kuwait, in par­ti­cu­lar, as an exam­p­le of what they can do in retaliation.”“The US is cle­ar­ly hit­ting the south in Iran and hit­ting air­ports, desa­li­na­ti­on plants, and bridges, and so the same kinds of things are being hit now in Kuwait to show what kind of effect Iran real­ly can have on tho­se count­ries that are hos­ting Ame­ri­can bases,” she said. Ken­neth Roth, for­mer exe­cu­ti­ve direc­tor of Human Rights Watch, echo­ed Ira­ni­an offi­ci­als’ con­dem­na­ti­on of the US attack on the sou­thern water desa­li­na­ti­on plant on Satur­day, say­ing it was “not a legi­ti­ma­te mili­ta­ry target.”“It is a war crime to tar­get it,” he said.

  • ‘One-Way Ticket to Extinc­tion’: Trump Admin Again Guts End­an­ge­red Spe­ci­es Act
    von Julia Con­ley am Sams­tag, 18. Juli 2026 um 14:34

    “Yet again, the Trump admi­nis­tra­ti­on has sold out our end­an­ge­red wild­life to the hig­hest bidder,” said one bio­di­ver­si­ty advo­ca­te after the US Depart­ment of Inte­ri­or, in a Fri­day news dump, issued two new poli­cy chan­ges that would wea­k­en the End­an­ge­red Spe­ci­es Act and make it easier for cor­po­ra­te pol­lu­ters to prio­ri­ti­ze their own bot­tom lines over habi­tat pro­tec­tion. The US Fish and Wild­life Ser­vice (FWS) resc­in­ded a poli­cy that has been known as the “blan­ket rule” sin­ce 1975, which has given threa­ten­ed spe­ci­es the same pro­tec­tions from ille­gal kil­ling, trap­ping, harass­ment, and other forms of “take” under the ESA, as spe­ci­es that are offi­ci­al­ly desi­gna­ted as end­an­ge­red. The roll­back would app­ly to spe­ci­es that have been new­ly declared as threa­ten­ed, inclu­ding the Flo­ri­da mana­tee, the Pyg­my rab­bit, the Aztec Gilia, and Clover’s Cactus—which could now go for years wit­hout pro­tec­tions despi­te their habi­tat loss and decli­ning popu­la­ti­ons. “Today’s decis­i­on repres­ents a pro­found fail­ure by Inte­ri­or Secre­ta­ry [Doug] Bur­gum and his depart­ment, and it amounts to an utter abdi­ca­ti­on of the fede­ral government’s respon­si­bi­li­ty to pro­tect America’s wild­life,” said Sara Amund­son, pre­si­dent of the Huma­ne World Action Fund. “The department’s role is to faithful­ly implement—and cer­tain­ly not to dismantle—the End­an­ge­red Spe­ci­es Act.”The other poli­cy chan­ge will requi­re the FWS to con­sider the eco­no­mic impact on various indus­tries of desi­gna­ting are­as as “cri­ti­cal” habi­tats in order to pro­tect threa­ten­ed and end­an­ge­red spe­ci­es. The agen­cy has pre­vious­ly had dis­cre­ti­on over whe­ther to con­sider eco­no­mics when making habi­tat pro­tec­tion decis­i­ons. Under Pre­si­dent Donald Trump’s new rule, said the Cen­ter for Bio­lo­gi­cal Diver­si­ty, the FWS will be forced “to accept at face value claims by cor­po­ra­ti­ons and lan­dow­ners of eco­no­mic impacts from desi­gna­ting cri­ti­cal habi­tat, which could great­ly limit the amount and qua­li­ty of habi­tat pro­tec­ted for impe­ri­led wildlife.”“Trump is ben­ding over back­ward for cor­po­ra­te pol­lu­ters by rip­ping away the blan­ket that pro­tects so many strugg­ling wild­life spe­ci­es as well as the air we brea­the, the water we drink, and the natu­ral places whe­re we seek peace of mind.”“The way this is writ­ten, a lan­dow­ner could fal­se­ly cla­im they plan­ned to build the next Dis­ney­land on their pro­per­ty, so desi­gna­ting cri­ti­cal habi­tat would sup­po­sedly cost them tens of mil­li­ons of dol­lars,” said Noah Green­wald, CBD’s end­an­ge­red spe­ci­es co-direc­tor. “This rule is cle­ar­ly inten­ded to pre­vent the pro­tec­tion of the wild places that end­an­ge­red ani­mals and plants need to sur­vi­ve. It’s a despi­ca­ble move that che­a­pens the value of our most impe­ri­led wild­life so cor­po­ra­ti­ons can make more money. Anyo­ne can make outra­ge­ous claims about how much their pro­per­ty is worth, but that shouldn’t be taken as gospel.”Advocacy groups said both poli­cy chan­ges amoun­ted to givea­ways to the log­ging, mining, dril­ling, and catt­le ran­ching indus­tries. The lat­ter indus­try has long lob­bied against land being desi­gna­ted as a cri­ti­cal habi­tat for the ‘I‘iwi bird in Hawaii, Clay Sam­ford, an att­or­ney with the envi­ron­men­tal legal group Ear­th­ju­s­ti­ce, told The Washing­ton Post. “It’s part of this administration’s push to redu­ce pro­tec­tions for public lands and wild­life that are enjoy­ed by all Ame­ri­cans, in favor of nar­row busi­ness inte­rests,” Sam­ford told the news­pa­per. A seni­or att­or­ney for the group, Eliza­beth For­syth, said in a state­ment that “the Trump admi­nis­tra­ti­on is tur­ning the law on its head by let­ting extra­c­ti­ve indus­tries dic­ta­te whe­re cri­ti­cal habi­tat can be destroyed.”“This prio­ri­tiza­ti­on of indus­try inte­rests over sci­ence is fun­da­men­tal­ly at odds with the clear pur­po­se of the End­an­ge­red Spe­ci­es Act,” said For­syth. “We won’t let this dan­ge­rous givea­way go unchallenged.”There is curr­ent­ly a back­log of more than 500 spe­ci­es awai­ting con­side­ra­ti­on for lis­ting as threa­ten­ed or end­an­ge­red, and the rule chan­ges, along with the Trump administration’s 18% reduc­tion in the FWS work­force, are expec­ted to lea­ve impe­ri­led spe­ci­es wai­ting even lon­ger for pro­tec­tions. “In the midst of an extinc­tion cri­sis, with hundreds of spe­ci­es like the Flo­ri­da mana­tee and the wol­veri­ne despera­te­ly nee­ding stron­ger pro­tec­tions for their habi­tats, the Trump admi­nis­tra­ti­on is gut­ting pro­tec­tions to bene­fit indus­try inte­rests,” said Ryan Shan­non, a seni­or att­or­ney at Defen­ders of Wild­life. “Whe­re we see our nation’s irre­placeable wild­life, they see dol­lar signs. But our fede­ral lands and waters, and the spe­ci­es they sup­port, belong to all Ame­ri­cans, not to the log­ging, dril­ling, and mining indus­tries that oppo­se all limits on maxi­mi­zing their pri­va­te profits.”In a state­ment, Inte­ri­or Secre­ta­ry Doug Bur­gum asser­ted that the ESA has long been “wea­po­nized to stop almost any new pro­ject in Ame­ri­ca, dri­ving up cos­ts for fami­lies, wea­k­e­ning our com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness, and under­mi­ning our natio­nal secu­ri­ty,” con­tin­ued Secre­ta­ry Bur­gum. He added that the end­an­ge­red spe­ci­es list has “fal­len short,” with 97% of lis­ted spe­ci­es remai­ning desi­gna­ted as end­an­ge­red, and cal­led for “spe­ci­es reco­very and delisting.“But Defen­ders of Wild­life noted that the ESA “has suc­cee­ded in pre­ven­ting extinc­tion for 99% of lis­ted species.”“Public sup­port for pro­tec­ting our nati­ve wild­life remains over­whel­mingly high, with 84% of voters sup­port­ing the ESA, accor­ding to nati­on­wi­de pol­ling con­duc­ted by Defen­ders of Wild­life,” said the group.The rules announ­ced on Fri­day came days after the Inte­ri­or Depart­ment pro­po­sed a new rule under which manage­ment of threa­ten­ed grizz­ly bears would be trans­fer­red from the fede­ral govern­ment to the sta­tes, whe­re Repu­bli­can lea­ders have pushed to end pro­tec­tions for the spe­ci­es. The admi­nis­tra­ti­on also exempt­ed oil and gas com­pa­nies from having to pro­tect end­an­ge­red spe­ci­es in the Gulf of Mexi­co, and ear­lier this month chan­ged the regu­la­to­ry inter­pre­ta­ti­on of the word “harm” in the ESA. “The­se rules are a one-way ticket to extinc­tion for our most impe­ri­led ani­mals and plants, from mon­arch but­ter­flies to giraf­fes to alli­ga­tor snap­ping turt­les,” said Green­wald. “Trump is ben­ding over back­ward for cor­po­ra­te pol­lu­ters by rip­ping away the blan­ket that pro­tects so many strugg­ling wild­life spe­ci­es as well as the air we brea­the, the water we drink, and the natu­ral places whe­re we seek peace of mind. This is the last thing we need in the midd­le of an extinc­tion cri­sis, and we’ll fight it with ever­y­thing we’ve got.”

  • Inspi­red by Trump, Isra­el Advan­ces Plan for Cro­co­di­le-Rin­ged Pri­son for Pal­es­ti­ni­ans
    von Brett Wil­kins am Frei­tag, 17. Juli 2026 um 23:10

    The Israe­li govern­ment this week strip­ped Nile cro­co­di­les of their pro­tec­ted sta­tus in order to advan­ce a pro­po­sal that Natio­nal Secu­ri­ty Minis­ter Ita­mar Ben-Gvir said was inspi­red by the Trump administration’s now-shut­te­red Alli­ga­tor Alca­traz to build a pri­son for Pal­es­ti­ni­ans sur­roun­ded by a moat full of the rave­nous reptiles.“You read that right,” the libe­ral US Jewish group J Street said in respon­se to the news. “When cruel­ty beco­mes a gover­ning prin­ci­ple ins­tead of an aberra­ti­on within the Israe­li govern­ment, some­thing has gone deep­ly wrong.“Israeli Envi­ron­men­tal Minis­ter Idit Sil­man signed a direc­ti­ve Wed­nes­day reclas­si­fy­ing Nile cro­co­di­les as “spe­ci­al­ly mana­ged wild ani­mals,” a novel legal cate­go­ry enab­ling the govern­ment to keep them for secu­ri­ty purposes.Ben-Gvir, who heads the Isra­el Pri­son Ser­vice (IPS), said he was inspi­red by the Trump administration’s recent­ly clo­sed Alli­ga­tor Alca­traz immi­grant detenti­on cen­ter in Flo­ri­da. He is see­king to first intro­du­ce cro­co­di­les into a moat around Ket­zi­ot Pri­son in sou­thern Israel.While it is not cer­tain that the plan will come to frui­ti­on, Ben-Gvir cele­bra­ted Silman’s decree in a social media post show­ing him pet­ting a cro­co­di­le, with the cap­ti­on: “Cur­sed ter­ro­rist, thin­king of try­ing to escape? Think again.“Palestinians have occa­sio­nal­ly escaped from Israe­li lock­ups, such as in Sep­tem­ber 2021, when six men used impro­vi­sed tools, inclu­ding spoons, to tun­nel out of the high-secu­ri­ty Gil­boa Pri­son. All six escapees were caught within weeks. (Pho­to by Ita­mar Ben-Gvir/Facebook)The move by Silman—who gai­ned inter­na­tio­nal noto­rie­ty by cal­ling for the eth­nic cle­an­sing of all Pal­es­ti­ni­ans from the Gaza Strip—came despi­te objec­tions from her own ministry’s legal advi­ser and the Natu­re and Parks Authority.IPS, which sent a fact-fin­ding mis­si­on to the Hamat Gader cro­co­di­le farm in Janu­ary, argued that its employees could hand­le the ani­mals, citing the agency’s expe­ri­ence working with the attack dogs that Pal­es­ti­ni­an pri­soners and human rights groups have clai­med were used to maul and even sexu­al­ly abu­se detainees.Silman’s appr­oval is con­tin­gent upon IPS mee­ting ani­mal wel­fa­re requi­re­ments and appro­pria­te hol­ding conditions.Meanwhile, Ben-Gvir has open­ly boas­ted about the dra­ma­tic dete­rio­ra­ti­on in con­di­ti­ons endu­red by Pal­es­ti­ni­an pri­soners sin­ce the Hamas-led attack of Octo­ber 7, 2023 and Israel’s reta­li­a­to­ry obli­te­ra­ti­on of Gaza, which United Nati­ons and other experts descri­be as a genocide.“We go into the pri­sons, and they wet them­sel­ves,” Ben-Gvir said of Pal­es­ti­ni­an pri­soners during a speech on Fri­day. “I’m not joking. They’­re afraid. Fear rules them, and that’s how it should be.” Ben-Gvir and other Israe­li offi­ci­als have worn noo­se lapel pins to cele­bra­te a recent­ly pas­sed bill lega­li­zing the exe­cu­ti­on by han­ging of so-cal­led “terrorists.“Former Pal­es­ti­ni­an detai­nees and Israe­li per­son­nel have descri­bed bea­tings, rape and sexu­al tor­tu­re by male and fema­le sol­diers, rou­ti­ne ampu­ta­ti­ons due to con­stant shack­ling, bur­nings, elec­tro­cu­ti­ons, attacks by dogs, ice-water dou­sings, deni­al of food and water, sleep depri­va­ti­on, con­stant loud music, and other abuse.The Israe­li mili­ta­ry is inves­ti­ga­ting the deaths of dozens of detai­nees at the Sde Tei­man pri­son in the Negev Desert, inclu­ding one who died after alle­gedly being sodo­mi­zed with an elec­tric baton.Ben-Gvir has defen­ded Israe­li reser­vists accu­sed of tor­tu­ring Pal­es­ti­ni­an pri­soners, and cal­led the reser­vists who alle­gedly gang-raped a man at Sde Tei­man pri­son “heroes.“The minis­ter is ban­ned from ente­ring a num­ber of Wes­tern count­ries for his inci­te­ment to vio­lence against Palestinians.Several Israe­li envi­ron­men­tal groups issued a joint state­ment oppo­sing the use of cro­co­di­les in prisons.“Crocodiles are sen­ti­ent beings, with com­plex needs for space, water, tem­pe­ra­tu­re, and natu­ral beha­vi­or,” the groups said. “It is also high­ly doubtful that the cro­co­di­les inten­ded for this pur­po­se have aggres­si­ve tem­pe­ra­ments, and in any event, during the win­ter they slow their meta­bo­lism dra­ma­ti­cal­ly, beco­me very slug­gish, and stop eating.”“Security should be achie­ved through real secu­ri­ty mea­su­res, not through ani­mals,” they added. “We are con­side­ring fil­ing a peti­ti­on with the High Court of Jus­ti­ce over the matter.”Last year, the Israe­li mili­ta­ry mas­sacred 262 cro­co­di­les that were being kept on a farm in the occu­p­ied West Bank near the ille­gal Israe­li sett­ler colo­ny of Petz­a­el, clai­ming the rep­ti­les posed a risk to the public. “They just slaugh­te­red them,” farm owner Dan­ny Bit­an told repor­ters at the time, describ­ing the sce­ne as “some kind of kil­ling val­ley.” Ben-Gvir’s plan comes amid ongo­ing slaugh­ter in Gaza—where Israe­li forces have kil­led more than 73,000 Pal­es­ti­ni­ans, over 21,500 of them child­ren, sin­ce Octo­ber 2023—and acce­le­ra­ting colo­niza­ti­on and eth­nic cle­an­sing in the West Bank. News of Silman’s appr­oval spark­ed dis­be­lief around the world and on social media, whe­re Red­dit users cal­led the plan “car­too­nish idio­cy” and “Bond vil­lain-level lunacy.”“The fact that Isra­el is try­ing to sur­round a pri­son with [cro­co­di­les] tells you all you need to know about the­se camps, which are desi­gned to tor­tu­re, rape, and mur­der Pal­es­ti­ni­ans, often held as hos­ta­ges wit­hout char­ges,” Israe­li rese­ar­cher and poli­ti­cal com­men­ta­tor Shai­el Ben-Ephra­im said Thurs­day on X.

  • Cli­ma­te Cri­sis-Deny­ing Trump Threa­tens Cana­da With New Tariffs Over Wild­fi­re Smo­ke
    von Jes­si­ca Cor­bett am Frei­tag, 17. Juli 2026 um 22:31

    A day after a Repu­bli­can sena­tor pled­ged to intro­du­ce legis­la­ti­on sanc­tio­ning Cana­da for the wild­fi­re smo­ke impac­ting various US com­mu­ni­ties this week, Pre­si­dent Donald Trump on Fri­day threa­ten­ed the United Sta­tes’ nor­t­hern neigh­bor with new tariffs.“We are hol­ding Cana­da respon­si­ble for the fact that they are not pro­per­ly main­tai­ning their Forests, and Brush the­r­ein, and the United Sta­tes is being unneces­s­a­ri­ly inva­ded by filt­hy, pol­lu­ted, and unhe­alt­hy air, the qua­li­ty of which is dan­ge­rous, and total­ly unac­cep­ta­ble!” Trump wro­te on his Truth Social plat­form. “I will call the Prime Minis­ter during the day to find out what they are going to do about it.”“The cost is incal­culable! Cana­da has refu­sed to enga­ge in basic Forest Manage­ment and Debris Rem­oval, kno­wing that such refu­sal will lead to exact­ly this result,” Trump con­tin­ued. “This is Willful Negli­gence, and beco­ming a year­ly occur­rence, cos­ting the United Sta­tes Bil­li­ons of Dol­lars, which cost of this pol­lu­ti­on must of neces­si­ty be added to the TARIFFS Cana­da is curr­ent­ly pay­ing.” Mela­nie D’Ar­ri­go, a cam­pai­gner for sin­gle-pay­er health­ca­re in the United Sta­tes, respon­ded, “So can Cana­da hold US oil com­pa­nies, their lob­by­ists, and the con­gres­s­peo­p­le they bri­be for the cli­ma­te cri­sis that increa­ses droughts and the risk of the­se wildfires?”“When Trump talks about incre­asing tariffs on Cana­da, he’s tal­king about Ame­ri­cans pay­ing more for the things they need—because the increased cos­ts are paid by Ame­ri­can con­su­mers,” she also stres­sed. Accor­ding to the Cana­di­an Broad­cas­ting Cor­po­ra­ti­on, when asked for a com­ment on Trump’s post, a spo­kesper­son for Canada’s Embas­sy in Washing­ton, DC only said Ambassa­dor Mark Wise­man has “enga­ged direct­ly with key admi­nis­tra­ti­on and Hill offi­ci­als regar­ding the wild­fi­re emer­gen­cy in Cana­da, our efforts to address it, and the impact of wild­fi­re smo­ke on Cana­da and the US.“CBC noted that a day ear­lier, four Michi­gan Repu­bli­cans in the US House of Repre­sen­ta­ti­ves had made simi­lar state­ments in a let­ter to Prime Minis­ter Mark Car­ney, who did­n’t address the mis­si­ve when asked about it, but told repor­ters in French that “cli­ma­te chan­ge is everyone’s responsibility—truly everyone’s—including the United States.“Big Oil-backed Trump has nota­b­ly rejec­ted sci­en­ti­fic con­clu­si­ons about the fos­sil fuel-dri­ven cli­ma­te emer­gen­cy on the world stage and, throug­hout both terms, made various poli­cy decis­i­ons that ser­ve indus­try polluters—even as his own govern­ment con­ti­nues to publish cli­ma­te sci­ence. While Car­ney has publicly embra­ced cli­ma­te sci­ence, the Libe­ral lea­der has also recent­ly faced cri­ti­cism for “pou­ring fuel on the fla­mes of the cli­ma­te emer­gen­cy” by “expan­ding tar sands and the fra­cked gas indus­try.” Mean­while, the fires raging across Canada—and promp­ting air qua­li­ty alerts across the US Mid­west and Northwest—have spur­red calls for “Nurem­berg tri­als for Big Oil,” given that the bur­ning of fos­sil fuels has made the bla­zes more extre­me and frequent.Despite the sci­ence, Repu­bli­cans on Capi­tol Hill seem hell-bent on strict­ly bla­ming Cana­di­an forest manage­ment. Sen. Ber­nie Moreno (R‑Ohio), a key ally of Trump and the fos­sil fuel indus­try, said Thurs­day on the social media plat­form X that “I’ll be intro­du­cing a bill next week to sanc­tion Cana­da and the respon­si­ble Cana­di­an govern­ment offi­ci­als for this atrocity.“Replying to the post, cli­ma­te repor­ter Kate Aron­off wro­te that a “major func­tion of this site during cli­ma­te-fue­led dis­as­ters now is pro­vi­ding a space for right-win­gers to beta test incre­asing­ly ins­a­ne tal­king points for avo­i­ding the obvious.“More Per­fect Uni­on pro­du­cer Jor­dan Zaka­rin also fired back on X, wri­ting, “The United Sta­tes sanc­tio­ning ano­ther coun­try, much less Cana­da, for pol­lu­ti­on and envi­ron­men­tal des­truc­tion is the stuff of bad sati­re.” Fos­sil Free Media direc­tor Jamie Henn said, “How about sanc­tio­ning the com­pa­nies fue­ling the cli­ma­te cri­sis that’s making the­se fires more fre­quent and intense?“Democrats in Washing­ton, DC “should intro­du­ce a Make Pol­lu­ters Pay bill that taxes oil and gas com­pa­nies’ record pro­fits and uses the reve­nue for wild­fi­re reli­ef, air puri­fiers, and all the adapt­a­ti­ons we need to… deal with the­se cli­ma­te dis­as­ters they hel­ped crea­te,” he pro­po­sed. Sen. Ber­nie San­ders, a Ver­mont Inde­pen­dent who cau­cu­ses with Demo­crats, also took aim at Repu­bli­can cli­ma­te lies in a leng­thy social media post on Thurs­day, not­ing that “in both the United Sta­tes and Cana­da, this heat and drought is dri­ving lon­ger and more inten­se wild­fi­re sea­sons, inclu­ding the more than 800 wild­fi­res across Cana­da and nor­t­hern Min­ne­so­ta that are curr­ent­ly caus­ing dan­ge­rous levels of air pol­lu­ti­on for at least 115 mil­li­on peo­p­le across 20 states.”“NO, Mr. Pre­si­dent: Cli­ma­te chan­ge is not a hoax. It is rea­li­ty. And your igno­rance is put­ting our kids and grand­kids at risk in exch­an­ge for the short-term pro­fit of your bil­lionaire fri­ends in Big Oil,” San­ders said. “Our job: Reject Pre­si­dent Trump’s lies and take on the cri­sis of cli­ma­te chan­ge and the greed of the fos­sil fuel indus­try by tran­si­tio­ning our ener­gy sys­tem to ener­gy effi­ci­en­cy and sus­tainable forms of power. When we do that, we cut car­bon emis­si­ons, redu­ce ener­gy bills, and crea­te mil­li­ons of good uni­on jobs.” Cass­idy DiPao­la, com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons direc­tor for the Make Pol­lu­ters Pay cam­paign, char­ged that “bla­ming Cana­da for the­se wild­fi­res is like bla­ming a homeow­ner when an arso­nist sets their house on fire. Cana­da is cho­king on the same smo­ke we are, and sanc­tio­ning our clo­sest ally does­n’t clear a sin­gle acre of bur­ned forest or stop the next fire from starting.”“If Repu­bli­cans actual­ly wan­ted to hold someone respon­si­ble, they’d go after the fos­sil fuel com­pa­nies who­se exe­cu­ti­ves knew what their pro­ducts were doing to the pla­net and buried the sci­ence any­way,” she argued. “Ins­tead, Con­gress is moving in the oppo­si­te direc­tion, weig­hing legis­la­ti­on that would grant the fos­sil fuel indus­try total immu­ni­ty from cli­ma­te lia­bi­li­ty. And if Repu­bli­cans wan­ted poli­ci­es that actual­ly pro­tect their con­sti­tu­ents’ health, they’d sup­port cli­ma­te super­fund bills that fund public health pro­grams, help wild­fi­re sur­vi­vors rebuild, and prepa­re com­mu­ni­ties for the risks still ahead.“Moreno’s bill, she added, “is a shame­l­ess attempt to make sure the bla­me lands any­whe­re but on the fos­sil fuel indus­try, and ever­y­day Ame­ri­cans will pay the pri­ce for that mis­di­rec­tion while the com­pa­nies that cau­sed this cri­sis walk away untouch­ed.”

commondreams.org

Lass ande­re teil­ha­ben und nut­ze die Mög­lich­kei­ten zum tei­len